Self-Evaluation Framework
A structured framework supporting evidence-informed reflection across key areas of school provision and performance.
Planned
NTES Leadership Resource
School Improvement Review Toolkit
Diagnostic review, evidence gathering and measurable action planning.
ReviewPrioritisePlanImprove
Continuous improvement
NTPremium School Leadership Resource
School Improvement Review Toolkit
A planned professional toolkit supporting school self-evaluation, evidence gathering, diagnostic review, improvement planning and sustained implementation.
School LeadersQuality TeamsK–12 SchoolsDigital Resource
Indicative launch price
€89
Final contents and price to be confirmed
This premium toolkit is currently planned and in development
This page describes the proposed resource. Contents, formats, licensing arrangements and pricing may change before release. No payment is being accepted at this stage.
Toolkit overview
Turn evidence into focused and measurable improvement
The School Improvement Review Toolkit is being developed to help leaders conduct proportionate, evidence-informed reviews without turning improvement into an unnecessary documentation exercise.
The proposed resource will guide teams from defining the review focus through evidence gathering, evaluation, priority setting, action planning and progress monitoring.
It will be designed for adaptation because schools operate within different curricula, governance arrangements, communities and regulatory contexts.
Proposed toolkit contents
A structured foundation for review and action planning
Final contents and formats will be confirmed before launch.
Diagnostic Review Tools
Review questions, evidence prompts and rating guidance intended to help teams identify strengths and priorities.
Evidence-Gathering Templates
Templates supporting document review, stakeholder feedback, learning evidence and professional discussion.
Department Review Materials
Proposed tools for curriculum, subject and departmental review within a wider school-improvement process.
Action-Planning Templates
Structured formats linking priorities, actions, ownership, timescales, resources, success criteria and monitoring.
Progress-Monitoring Tools
Review schedules, milestone checks and evaluation prompts supporting sustained implementation and refinement.
Proposed review areas
Adaptable diagnostic lenses for school improvement
Schools will select and adapt review areas according to their context, priorities and applicable requirements.
Leadership and Direction
Review vision, strategic priorities, leadership responsibilities, communication and implementation capacity.
Curriculum and Learning
Consider curriculum intent, coherence, implementation, learner experience and opportunities for progression.
Teaching and Assessment
Examine professional practice, classroom evidence, assessment approaches, feedback and responsive teaching.
Student Outcomes
Review available achievement, progress, participation and wider-development evidence within the school context.
Inclusion and Wellbeing
Consider access, support, belonging, wellbeing and how effectively different learner needs are understood.
Professional Development
Review staff learning, professional collaboration, implementation support and evaluation of development activity.
Digital and AI Readiness
Consider digital strategy, infrastructure, responsible AI, staff capability, data protection and implementation planning.
Quality Assurance
Review monitoring processes, evidence quality, follow-up, accountability and continuous-improvement routines.
Improvement-review process
From review scope to monitored implementation
01
Define the Scope
Agree the purpose, focus, participants, evidence sources, responsibilities and timetable for the review.
02
Gather Evidence
Collect proportionate evidence from documents, data, stakeholder perspectives and professional activity.
03
Evaluate
Triangulate evidence, identify strengths, consider limitations and determine significant improvement priorities.
04
Plan Action
Translate priorities into clear actions, responsibilities, timescales, resources and measurable success criteria.
05
Monitor Progress
Review implementation, evaluate impact, capture learning and adjust actions when evidence indicates a need.
Intended professional outcomes
Strengthen evidence-informed improvement practice
The planned toolkit will focus on practical review capability, meaningful priorities and sustained implementation.
✓
Conduct a structured and proportionate school self-evaluation.
✓
Identify strengths using relevant and triangulated evidence.
✓
Recognise significant development needs and contributing factors.
✓
Prioritise improvement actions according to impact and feasibility.
✓
Create measurable plans with clear ownership and timescales.
✓
Connect professional development to identified school priorities.
✓
Monitor implementation and evaluate emerging evidence of impact.
✓
Strengthen a sustainable culture of reflection and improvement.
Evidence principles
Collect evidence that supports better decisions
Purposeful
Evidence should answer the agreed review questions rather than being collected without a clear purpose.
Proportionate
The scale of evidence gathering should reflect the importance, risk and scope of the review.
Triangulated
Important findings should draw on more than one relevant evidence source whenever practical.
Contextualised
Evidence should be interpreted within the school’s learners, curriculum, community and operating context.
Transparent
Teams should understand how findings were reached and recognise limitations or gaps in available evidence.
Improvement Focused
The purpose of review is to support better decisions and outcomes, not simply to produce additional documentation.
Proposed licensing
Options for leaders, teams and schools
Final licence permissions and prices will be confirmed before launch.
Individual Leader
Proposed access for one named school leader, reviewer or improvement professional.
Register InterestLeadership-Team Licence
Proposed access for an eligible senior, middle-leadership or quality-assurance team.
Register InterestWhole-School Licence
Proposed wider access supporting departmental and whole-school review within one organisation.
Register InterestToolkit and Consultancy
Proposed toolkit access combined with facilitated review, action planning or implementation support.
Register InterestFrequently asked questions
Questions about the planned toolkit
Is the School Improvement Review Toolkit available now?
Not yet. The toolkit is currently planned and in development. You can view the free school-improvement exemplar and register your interest in the proposed complete resource.
Is €89 the final price?
No. €89 is an indicative launch price for the proposed individual resource. Final contents, licensing, price, taxes and delivery arrangements will be confirmed before launch.
Is the toolkit intended only for school inspections?
No. It is primarily being developed for internal self-evaluation, diagnostic review, improvement planning and quality assurance. Schools remain responsible for checking any official requirements that apply to them.
Does the toolkit guarantee inspection outcomes?
No. No resource can guarantee an inspection judgement or school outcome. The planned toolkit supports structured review and improvement but does not replace official guidance, professional judgement or external advice.
Can international schools use the toolkit?
Yes. The proposed toolkit is intended to be adaptable across different international K–12 contexts. Schools will need to align it with their curriculum, governance and regulatory requirements.
Will editable templates be included?
Editable formats are planned for appropriate review and action-planning materials. Exact formats and licensing permissions will be confirmed before launch.
Can NTES support a school with implementation?
Proposed consultancy options include facilitated review, priority setting, action planning, professional development and implementation support.
Important professional notice
This independently developed resource is intended to support internal review and improvement planning. It does not replace official inspection frameworks, statutory requirements, accreditation standards, legal advice or professional judgement. Schools remain responsible for verifying and following the requirements that apply within their jurisdiction.
School Improvement Review Toolkit
Register your interest in the planned toolkit
Receive information about development progress, proposed contents, licensing and availability when the resource is ready.